Editorial policy
How Nanyana approaches listening, reporting, interviews, corrections and uncertainty.
- Editorial information
Nanyana begins with a question rather than a keyword. We listen closely, describe context, and separate what a page observes from what it infers. A review can be concise without pretending that taste is a measurement; a scene report can be useful without claiming to represent an entire city.
Interviews should respect an artist’s time. Questions are prepared, follow-ups stay connected to the answer, and edits should preserve meaning. We avoid invented quotes, invented access, inflated audience claims and descriptions that cannot be checked.
Corrections and updates
When a factual error is identified, we review the source and correct the page as needed. Readers can report an issue through [email protected]. Disagreement with a judgment is welcome, but it is not presented as a factual correction.