Editorial policy
How Nanyana approaches listening, reporting, interviews, corrections and uncertainty.
- Editorial information
Nanyana begins with a question rather than a keyword. We listen closely, describe context, and separate what a page observes from what it infers. A review can be concise without pretending that taste is a measurement; a scene report can be useful without claiming to represent an entire city.
Interviews should respect an artist’s time. Questions are prepared, follow-ups stay connected to the answer, and edits should preserve meaning. We avoid invented quotes, invented access, inflated audience claims and descriptions that cannot be checked. Description is the part we take most seriously: naming what an instrument or a room actually is, in the same spirit as a catalogue that lists the materials in Catholic devotional objects before saying anything about their meaning.
Corrections and updates
When a factual error is identified, we review the source and correct the page as needed. Readers can report an issue through [email protected]. Disagreement with a judgment is welcome, but it is not presented as a factual correction.